Free Cost Analysis Audit 800-577-6202

Ozone Laundry System Reduces Hotel Operational Costs by 40%

An Article for Water Quality Products Magazine
By Marc DeBrum, ClearWater Tech, LLC

The laundry room consists of two 80 lbs. Unimac Commercial Washers and two 120 lbs. Unimac Commercial Dryers. Twenty loads per day were laundered on the average, for a total of 1,600 lbs. per day. Traditional laundering was conducted for one month, followed by ozone laundering for a second month.

The ozone system installed for this study was a ClearWater Tech EcoTex system consisting of an ECO2 ozone generator (maximum ozone output rating of 8 grams per hour at 3% concentration by weight), a Sequal Technologies Workhorse 8c Oxygen Concentrator, an AeroQual 100 Ambient Air Ozone Monitor, and an EcoTex Diffuser installed in the sump of the clothes washer.

Growing operational costs and lower than average occupancy rates spurred Apple Farm Inn and Suites, San Luis Obispo, Ca., to explore economic and facility efficiency benefits obtained through the installation of an ozone laundry system. At the Apple Farm Inn laundry facility, an evaluation was conducted in late 2006 to early 2007, comparing the costs of laundering by traditional methods versus ozone laundering.

Facilities and Equipment Employed

The Apple Farm Inn is a hospitality hotel with 104 occupancy rooms. Laundry processed includes bedding (sheets, blankets, pillow cases) and towels (from rooms and swimming pool area), bath mats and robes.

Traditional vs Ozone Laundering Cycles Used

A key step in the application of ozone to be used in a commercial laundry facility is to determine the appropriate cycle configurations. Among other factors, these wash cycles are designed based on the type of linen being laundered, the soil content of the linen, and the capacity of the washer. Figures 2 and 3 provide a visual indication of the differences between the traditional wash cycle and ozone wash cycle, respectively, used at the Apple Farm Inn. Chemical signals are as follows; S1 = Break (alkali, pH increase chemical), S2 = Detergent/Suds, S3 = Bleach, S4 = Sour/Soft, S9 = Ozone

Commodity/Consumables Used

Figures 4 and 5 show the Traditional and Ozone formula totals used in each of the one month test times for each process. The bottom two lines show the costs per month and projected costs per year, respectively. The ozone system resulted in annual cost savings in all categories – water, chemicals, electrical (with ozone considered as electrical), natural gas and labor of $13,248, a 38% total annual savings.

Labor and Production Savings

One of the most interesting benefits found in the Apple Farm Inn case study is that of labor and production savings, which also can be quantified as facility efficiency. This efficiency was equated to the overall reduction of cycle time saved by the ozone laundry system. This does not necessarily mean that the facility paid less in staff labor, but rather that the staff was available to perform other housekeeping duties. The efficiencies of less water and fewer rinsing cycles resulting from ozone laundering allowed the Apple Farm Inn to launder nearly 60 more loads per month more than with their traditional wash cycles.

Return On Investment

Ozone laundry systems not only provide microbiological benefits, but through reduced cycles times, water, energy, and chemicals, they can also pay for themselves – typically within short time periods. As shown in Figures 4, 5 and 7, the ozone laundry system has saved the Apple Farm Inn nearly 40% of the annual overall costs related to the washing of linens in their laundry facility. This savings paid for the ozone laundering system in less than eight months.

The rate of return on a system such as this may increase dramatically through state and local energy providers and water companies who provide grants, rebates and other incentives to facilities that install energy and water-saving technologies and equipment.

Figure 8 shows an estimated payback time of 7.7 months resulting from the ozone laundering system, including the labor savings, of $1,756 per month or $22,517 (annually).

Conclusion

Although wash formula design and results may vary from facility-to-facility, ozone-laundering formulas and processes can provide this higher level of cleanliness and disinfection while increasing a facility’s energy and labor efficiencies. For nearly three years, the Apple Farm Inn and Suites has benefited financially as a result of the lower consumption of water (especially hot water), energy and labor. In addition to the savings, the facility and its management have been very grateful to the addition of their state-of-the-art environmentally-friendly laundry system.

recent posts

From the Floor Up

The Battle to Control HAIs by David Harry & Jack McGurk, MPA The Floor Could...

The Advantex® Advantage

FROM THE FLOOR UP – THE BATTLE TO CONTROL The floor could be the weakest...

How EcoTex Works

Traditional laundry services use hot water to aid chemical activation and provide thermal disinfection. The...

related articles

The Benefits of Ozone in Hospitality On-Premise Laundry Operations

Pacific Gas and Electric Company Emerging Technologies Program Application Assessment Report #0802 Executive Summary Project...

New Study: Towels Play Critical Role for Hotel Guests

New Study Published by American Laundry News: Towels Play Critical Role for Hotel Guests Cleanliness...

Best Western Reduces Annual Costs by $25K Using EcoTex System

Best Western Plus in Tempe, AZ Drastically Reduced Annual Costs by Installing the First Best...